
Product Marketing Manager, HP Business
Owned strategy, planning and budget allocation for HP at Ingram Micro Belgium
Captured the entire HP indirect budget, leaving the main competitor without allocation
When I joined Ingram Micro, I stepped into a much larger scale of marketing responsibility. HP represented a significant part of the business, and the expectations extended across multiple categories, partner activation, sales support, inventory movement and the wider objective of growing the brand through the channel.
There was already a substantial amount of marketing activity. Campaigns, vendor requests, partner initiatives, product pushes and tactical opportunities were appearing throughout the year, but most of them were being managed as separate pieces. The organisation was active, yet there was no single commercial logic connecting one quarter to the next, determining which audiences and categories deserved priority, or showing how the available budget should work together over the course of a full year.
The opportunity was therefore not to increase the volume of marketing. It was to give the existing activity a clearer commercial structure.
My background on the reseller side helped because I was already familiar with the realities faced by Ingram Micro's customers and with the way vendors approached channel investment. It also made me comfortable looking beyond traditional marketing metrics and considering how pricing, purchasing, stock position and sales priorities influenced what the business actually needed from Marketing.
I happened to sit close to the purchasing team, which created useful visibility into another part of the commercial system. They could see where inventory was accumulating, which products required additional support and where changing market conditions were beginning to create pressure. Those signals were directly relevant to marketing decisions, even though they would traditionally have been treated as purchasing concerns.
One discussion with HP illustrated the connection particularly clearly. Several products had been sitting in stock for too long, and neither organisation had found an effective way to resolve the issue. Instead of responding with another awareness campaign, part of the available marketing investment could be used to improve the effective commercial proposition and help move the inventory.
That example changed the way I thought about the budget. Marketing funds did not need to be allocated exclusively to communications activities in order to create commercial value. Their usefulness depended on whether they addressed the constraint facing the business at that moment.
Sometimes that meant generating visibility or activating partners, while at other times it meant supporting a product category, responding to seasonality or helping solve an inventory issue. The common requirement was that the investment should connect to a recognisable commercial objective rather than exist because a campaign slot or vendor budget happened to be available.
This created a stronger basis for planning because individual activities could be assessed as parts of the same growth system. Budget allocation became less about funding isolated campaigns and more about deciding how the available resources could contribute to HP's performance across the year.
Instead of producing another short-term campaign plan, I developed a full-year commercial marketing plan for HP. It brought the main product categories, audiences, seasonal opportunities, partner programmes, visibility requirements and growth priorities together within one structure.
That longer planning horizon changed the quality of the conversation with HP. Activities could be sequenced rather than negotiated independently, and investment decisions could be considered in the context of broader priorities rather than justified one campaign at a time.
It also made trade-offs easier to see. Some categories required sustained visibility, others were more seasonal, and certain opportunities depended on partner activation or stock conditions at particular moments in the year. Bringing those elements together created a much clearer view of how the marketing budget could support the commercial business as a whole.
I deliberately scoped the required investment around what the plan was designed to achieve rather than beginning with the previous year's budget and distributing it across another set of activities. The resulting request was approximately one and a half to two times the historical level, reflecting the scale and breadth of the plan rather than an arbitrary desire to increase spend.
That approach required the budget to be defensible in commercial terms. Every major element needed to connect back to the categories, audiences and growth priorities in the plan, which made the overall proposal easier to evaluate as an investment rather than as a collection of marketing costs.
When the plan was presented to HP's leadership team in Vilvoorde, it was approved in full without reductions.
Only afterwards did it become clear that Tech Data, Ingram Micro's largest competitor, had not yet submitted an equivalent plan. By approaching the year as one integrated commercial programme rather than a succession of campaign requests, Ingram Micro had secured the entire available HP indirect marketing budget for the market.
That outcome mattered financially, but it also changed the nature of the relationship with HP. Ingram Micro had presented itself as a partner capable of translating vendor investment into a structured commercial growth programme across categories and throughout the year.
The advantage did not come from asking more aggressively for budget. It came from giving HP a stronger reason to allocate that budget with confidence.
The experience reinforced the importance of connecting marketing decisions to the wider commercial environment. Campaign effectiveness cannot be considered separately from category priorities, sales requirements, inventory, partner behaviour and market timing when all of those factors influence the same revenue outcome.
A full-year plan created the structure needed to make those connections visible. It reduced the tendency to treat each new request as an isolated decision and made it easier to manage investment according to commercial priorities rather than historical activity patterns.
The result was a more coherent marketing system, stronger alignment with the vendor and a budget allocation that reflected the ambition of the plan rather than the precedent of the previous year.

The plan was presented in Vilvoorde to the leadership team.
There was no negotiation.
It was approved as-is.




A short diagnostic built on the Alignment Matrix. It points to where friction is most likely sitting — not a definitive answer.